Skip to content

Expense Metadata — Proposed Guide

Planned API — Reference Only

Expense Metadata: Expense metadata can hold an integration correlation value or a bounded annotation. It should not duplicate the entire source receipt or…

Overview

Expense metadata can hold an integration correlation value or a bounded annotation. It should not duplicate the entire source receipt or contain payment credentials.

Key concepts

Namespace integration-owned keys and document merge behavior. Keep structured financial fields outside arbitrary metadata.

Implementation considerations

Treat metadata as untrusted input when displaying or exporting it. Never allow it to override amount, approval state or organization identity.

Proposed API behavior

PATCH /v1/expenses/{expense_id}/metadata is an illustrative design for this topic. Path and field names may change before implementation. Access would require an authorized organization context and operation-specific permission; no public API or authorization grant is available here.

Proposed path parameters
NameTypeDescription
expense_idrequiredstringStable fictional expense reference; not a secret and not evidence that a resource exists.
Illustrative request fields
NameTypeDescription
metadataobjectBounded, namespaced annotations. Do not store credentials or bank details here.
versionintegerIllustrative resource revision for detecting stale updates; no live concurrency contract is published.

Static example requests

Proposed, non-executing request examples
# Proposed request text only; this reserved host is not a live API.
curl -X PATCH 'https://api.remizen.example/v1/expenses/exp_example_123/metadata' \
  -H 'Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY' \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  --data '{
  "metadata": {
    "example.source": "local-fixture"
  },
  "version": 1
}'

Fictional response example

200 (proposed example)Static response fixture

Fictional documentation data only. No request was sent, record created, review performed, payment initiated or provider connection activated.

JSON
{
  "data": {
    "expense_id": "exp_example_123",
    "metadata": {
      "example.source": "local-fixture"
    },
    "version": 1,
    "id": "exp_example_123",
    "organization_id": "org_example_123",
    "merchant": "Example Office Supply",
    "amount_minor": 12550,
    "currency": "USD",
    "status": "draft"
  },
  "meta": {
    "request_id": "req_example_123",
    "reference_only": true
  }
}

Illustrative error case

Review this failure case in context: Treat metadata as untrusted input when displaying or exporting it. Never allow it to override amount, approval state or organization identity.

422 (illustrative; final error contracts are undecided)Proposed error fixture

Synthetic diagnostic example. Human-readable messages must not be used as stable programmatic contracts.

JSON
{
  "error": {
    "code": "validation_error",
    "message": "The proposed expense metadata operation requires review of its input or authorization.",
    "request_id": "req_example_123"
  }
}

Proposed data types

Illustrative field dictionary
NameTypeDescription
expense_idstringStable fictional expense reference; not a secret and not evidence that a resource exists.
metadataobjectBounded, namespaced annotations. Do not store credentials or bank details here.
versionintegerIllustrative resource revision for detecting stale updates; no live concurrency contract is published.