Skip to content

Allowance Transactions — Proposed Guide

Planned API — Reference Only

Allowance Transactions: Allowance transactions would explain changes to an allocation ledger, such as consumption or reversal. They are not necessarily…

Overview

Allowance transactions would explain changes to an allocation ledger, such as consumption or reversal. They are not necessarily bank-payment transactions.

Key concepts

Link each entry to its source expense and period. Use a distinct reversal reference rather than deleting an original entry.

Implementation considerations

Avoid counting the same expense twice after retries or resubmission. Currency and entry direction must be explicit.

Proposed API behavior

GET /v1/allowances/{allowance_id}/transactions is an illustrative design for this topic. Path and field names may change before implementation. Access would require an authorized organization context and operation-specific permission; no public API or authorization grant is available here.

Proposed path parameters
NameTypeDescription
allowance_idrequiredstringStable fictional allowance reference; not a secret and not evidence that a resource exists.

No additional request fields are illustrated; this is not a finalized contract.

Static example requests

Proposed, non-executing request examples
# Proposed request text only; this reserved host is not a live API.
curl -X GET 'https://api.remizen.example/v1/allowances/allowance_example_123/transactions' \
  -H 'Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY'

Fictional response example

200 (proposed example)Static response fixture

Fictional documentation data only. No request was sent, record created, review performed, payment initiated or provider connection activated.

JSON
{
  "data": {
    "allowance_id": "allowance_example_123",
    "expense_id": "exp_example_123",
    "amount_minor": 12550,
    "entry_type": "entry type example",
    "id": "allowances_example_123",
    "organization_id": "org_example_123"
  },
  "meta": {
    "request_id": "req_example_123",
    "reference_only": true
  }
}

Illustrative error case

Review this failure case in context: Avoid counting the same expense twice after retries or resubmission. Currency and entry direction must be explicit.

422 (illustrative; final error contracts are undecided)Proposed error fixture

Synthetic diagnostic example. Human-readable messages must not be used as stable programmatic contracts.

JSON
{
  "error": {
    "code": "validation_error",
    "message": "The proposed allowance transactions operation requires review of its input or authorization.",
    "request_id": "req_example_123"
  }
}

Proposed data types

Illustrative field dictionary
NameTypeDescription
allowance_idstringStable fictional allowance reference; not a secret and not evidence that a resource exists.
expense_idstringStable fictional expense reference; not a secret and not evidence that a resource exists.
amount_minorintegerMonetary amount in the documented currency minor unit; 12550 represents USD 125.50, not USD 12,550.
entry_typestringIllustrative entry type value; interpret it only within the proposed topic-specific model described above.