Webhook Security — Proposed Guide
Planned API — Reference OnlyWebhook Security: Secure consumption would require origin verification, scoped event handling and careful treatment of untrusted payloads. A valid…
Overview
Secure consumption would require origin verification, scoped event handling and careful treatment of untrusted payloads. A valid signature does not make every downstream action authorized.
Key concepts
Restrict receiver exposure, validate schema and apply resource-level business checks. Avoid forwarding secrets in event metadata.
Implementation considerations
No security control is installed by this page. Do not allow a received event to initiate money movement without separately approved financial controls.
Illustrative data model
This local fixture shows a possible representation for the concepts above. It is not an endpoint response, production configuration or a claim that the described capability is implemented.
{
"reference_only": true,
"topic": "Webhook Security",
"event_type": "expense.updated",
"organization_id": "org_example_123",
"schema_version": "preview-1"
}Design review checklist
- Document which organization owns the webhook security representation and which actor may view or change it.
- Test the boundaries of event type, organization id, schema version using synthetic values, including missing or inconsistent references.
- Before future implementation, obtain an approved contract and review failure behavior. This documentation does not authorize production activation.
Proposed data types
| Name | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| event_type | string | Illustrative business-fact name, not an instruction to move funds. |
| organization_id | string | Stable fictional organization reference; not a secret and not evidence that a resource exists. |
| schema_version | string | Proposed event schema revision, independent of transport delivery attempts. |