Company Vehicles — Proposed Guide
Planned API — Reference OnlyCompany Vehicles: A company-vehicle directory would expose approved vehicle references and assignment context. It should not contain unnecessary location…
Overview
A company-vehicle directory would expose approved vehicle references and assignment context. It should not contain unnecessary location history or sensitive access credentials.
Key concepts
Use vehicle identity independently of a license label and record active state. Preserve the owning entity.
Implementation considerations
A vehicle record is not evidence of an insurance policy or maintenance compliance. Those facts require separate approved sources.
Proposed API behavior
GET /v1/fleet/company-vehicles is an illustrative design for this topic. Path and field names may change before implementation. Access would require an authorized organization context and operation-specific permission; no public API or authorization grant is available here.
| Name | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| subsidiary_id | string | Stable fictional subsidiary reference; not a secret and not evidence that a resource exists. |
| status | string | Proposed lifecycle value. Its meaning depends on the resource and must not be inferred from HTTP success. |
Static example requests
# Proposed request text only; this reserved host is not a live API.
curl -X GET 'https://api.remizen.example/v1/fleet/company-vehicles?subsidiary_id=sub_example_123&status=draft' \
-H 'Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY'Fictional response example
Fictional documentation data only. No request was sent, record created, review performed, payment initiated or provider connection activated.
{
"data": [
{
"vehicle_id": "veh_example_123",
"vehicle_label": "vehicle label example",
"id": "fleet_example_123",
"organization_id": "org_example_123"
}
],
"pagination": {
"has_more": false,
"next_cursor": null
},
"meta": {
"request_id": "req_example_123",
"reference_only": true
}
}Illustrative error case
Review this failure case in context: A vehicle record is not evidence of an insurance policy or maintenance compliance. Those facts require separate approved sources.
Synthetic diagnostic example. Human-readable messages must not be used as stable programmatic contracts.
{
"error": {
"code": "validation_error",
"message": "The proposed company vehicles operation requires review of its input or authorization.",
"request_id": "req_example_123"
}
}Proposed data types
| Name | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| vehicle_id | string | Stable fictional vehicle reference; not a secret and not evidence that a resource exists. |
| subsidiary_id | string | Stable fictional subsidiary reference; not a secret and not evidence that a resource exists. |
| vehicle_label | string | Illustrative vehicle label value; interpret it only within the proposed topic-specific model described above. |
| status | string | Proposed lifecycle value. Its meaning depends on the resource and must not be inferred from HTTP success. |