Skip to content

List Users — Proposed Guide

Planned API — Reference Only

List Users: A user collection would support organizational administration without revealing users from another entity. Filters should distinguish active…

Overview

A user collection would support organizational administration without revealing users from another entity. Filters should distinguish active application access from current employment status.

Key concepts

Paginate consistently and use an explicit status filter when building a directory. A display name should not be a deduplication key.

Implementation considerations

Do not interpret an absent record on one page as a deleted employee. Only a complete traversal or an explicit lifecycle signal can support that conclusion.

Proposed API behavior

GET /v1/users is an illustrative design for this topic. Path and field names may change before implementation. Access would require an authorized organization context and operation-specific permission; no public API or authorization grant is available here.

Illustrative query parameters
NameTypeDescription
limitintegerRequested collection size. This example is not a promised service limit.
cursorstringOpaque fictional continuation value; retain the original filters when following it.
statusstringProposed lifecycle value. Its meaning depends on the resource and must not be inferred from HTTP success.
department_idstringStable fictional department reference; not a secret and not evidence that a resource exists.

Static example requests

Proposed, non-executing request examples
# Proposed request text only; this reserved host is not a live API.
curl -X GET 'https://api.remizen.example/v1/users?limit=25&cursor=cursor_example_123&status=active&department_id=dept_example_123' \
  -H 'Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY'

Fictional response example

200 (proposed example)Static response fixture

Fictional documentation data only. No request was sent, record created, review performed, payment initiated or provider connection activated.

JSON
{
  "data": [
    {
      "id": "usr_example_123",
      "organization_id": "org_example_123",
      "display_name": "Taylor Example",
      "email": "taylor@example.com",
      "status": "active"
    }
  ],
  "pagination": {
    "has_more": false,
    "next_cursor": null
  },
  "meta": {
    "request_id": "req_example_123",
    "reference_only": true
  }
}

Illustrative error case

Review this failure case in context: Do not interpret an absent record on one page as a deleted employee. Only a complete traversal or an explicit lifecycle signal can support that conclusion.

422 (illustrative; final error contracts are undecided)Proposed error fixture

Synthetic diagnostic example. Human-readable messages must not be used as stable programmatic contracts.

JSON
{
  "error": {
    "code": "validation_error",
    "message": "The proposed list users operation requires review of its input or authorization.",
    "request_id": "req_example_123"
  }
}

Proposed data types

Illustrative field dictionary
NameTypeDescription
limitintegerRequested collection size. This example is not a promised service limit.
cursorstringOpaque fictional continuation value; retain the original filters when following it.
statusstringProposed lifecycle value. Its meaning depends on the resource and must not be inferred from HTTP success.
department_idstringStable fictional department reference; not a secret and not evidence that a resource exists.